Especially with the contrast between the number of hair transplant methods currently available against the information posted about them, the FUE vs FUT debate carries lots of ambiguity and intricate details.
Torn between internet research results and advertisements, hair transplant patients are often lost on what technique to opt for and which method would best complement their case. Making the decision to undergo surgery was the easy part, but choosing the right hair transplant technique is a whole different story that requires a lot of diligence.
However, you do not need to worry anymore, in this article we will thoroughly discuss all the methods so that by the end, all confusion related to hair transplant techniques is everything but existent.
FUE vs FUT: The Standard Hair Transplant Techniques
Despite the range of hair transplant techniques currently on the market, there are only TWO standard methods. Follicular unit extraction (FUE) and follicular unit transplantation (FUT) are the primary techniques for the procedure. Everything else is a variant of either one of the aforementioned techniques; we’ll get into that in a second. Both FUE and FUT have a similar process overview: both include extraction of hair from donor sites, preservation of the extracted grafts, creation of incisions on recipient sites, and finally implantation. To understand the underlying differences, we’ll divide the FUE vs FUT discourse into points to compare the minutiae of each phase for either technique.
Extraction Of Grafts
- FUT hair transplant: in FUT, to extract the grafts, a surgeon will have to surgically excise the donor region and later dissect the strip to harvest the units. The excision is then stitched, and the piece is dismembered under a microscope. The method of graft harvesting in FUT leaves a conspicuously visible linear scar in the donor region. In addition as well as to permanent or semi-permanent nerve damage.
- FUE hair transplant: In FUE, to extract grafts, a surgeon will utilize a motor punch that is around 0.8 mm in diameter to harvest individual grafts separately. The punch creates an incision around the hair follicle allowing for it to be extracted via tweezers. The micro size of the punch does not leave behind any scarring or nerve damage as opposed to FUT.
This step is the same in both FUE and FUT. Using a blade, your surgeon will create incisions on the recipient site. Those incisions will host the new hair follicles to prepare the site for implantation. The number of incisions depends entirely on the number of grafts to be implanted.
This procedure is also the same in both FUE and FUT. Once the recipient site is ready, grafts will be carefully inserted in the incision. Marking by that, the end of the surgical procedure.
Aside from procedural differences, or in other words, as a result of these procedural differences; FUE is more popular among doctors and patients alike. With FUE there is no linear scar or any scarring at all. In addition to that, it allows for shorter recovery periods and lower risks of infection.
Moreover, with FUE, any area on the body can work as a donor region. This is especially helpful when patients want to undergo hair transplantation on the face or other body regions.All these perks are, of course, a product of its minimally invasive nature. Given all that, FUE comes at a higher cost than FUT all around the globe so that it is not within the common man’s budget.
However, there are other alternatives that operate on milking the economic differences around the globe and taking advantage of the varying price tags. Turkey, for example, is a plausible economically efficient destination that offers high quality to cost FUE hair transplantation.
Variants Of The Standard Methods: FUE vs FUT
As we stated previously, there are only two standard hair transplant techniques. Other techniques are in reality variants of the standards with minor differences in equipment. To be precise, there are only variants of the FUE technique. Seeing as FUE is the most popular technique, it is always prone to advancement. Additionally, it has more potential in comparison to FUT.
FUT, on the other hand, is an outdated technique that is almost extinct on the market and is never subject to development. The vast majority of these techniques are exclusively offered by clinics in Turkey. Given its the hair transplant capital of the world. Without further ado, the developed FUE hair transplant techniques are currently Sapphire FUE and DHI Choi FUE.
♠ Sapphire FUE
- The Sapphire FUE follows the same procedure to the dot as the standard FUE hair transplant technique.
- The difference relies upon the equipment used and the butterfly effect this minor change initiates. Sapphire FUE uses blades made from the sapphire gemstone. So while this may seem like a trivial change, the use of sapphire to make the edge gravely impacts the structure.
- Sapphire blades have a V-shaped end in comparison to the U-shaped end in regular steel blades. As a result, the sharper end of sapphire allows surgeons to create more immaculate incisions at a much higher rate.
- With the increased level of precision in Sapphire FUE, there is no risk of damaging surrounding tissue. Moreover, healing rates are folds quicker with Sapphire FUE as a result of its sharp blade end.
♠ DHI Choi Technique
Similarly, DHI Choi FUE replicates every step of the FUE hair transplant technique excluding incision and implantation. In DHI, the last two steps are merged into one. This technique employs a pen-like needle that opens channels and simultaneously implants grafts.
During surgery, nurses usually load the pen with grafts where the surgeon will then use it to make incisions. Once the needle pin is inserted, the surgeon will load the grafts. This makes the process faster, but since it exposes the delicate grafts to extreme action; there is an increased risk of damaging the grafts leading to poor results.
What To Take From The FUE vs FUT Discourse
To cut the doubts clear with the FUE vs FUT discourse, keep a few facts in mind. FUE and FUT are both the foundational protocols for hair transplants. Every other technique then branches out from the FUE to be a variant of it.
- The key distinction between FUE and FUT is in the extraction phase.
- Typically, to sum up the FUE vs FUT argument, the most profound difference relies on the technique of graft harvesting.
- FUT leaves monumental damage with its invasive technology in comparison to the FUE technique.
- Although the FUE technique along with its variants comes at a higher cost, the value and satisfaction gained from them outweigh the financial factor. In other words, patients are getting value for their money.
By now, you have made it through the most critical parts of our article series that revolve around breaking down the essential steps of a hair transplant journey: candidacy, choosing the right clinic, and now choosing the right treatment. However, it does not end here, next on the chain of events is becoming familiar with
Contact The Vera Clinic
Kindly contact the Vera Clinic for further information on the FUE vs FUT discussion and alternative techniques.